and I have warned about this in other threads where such comments get voted down by swarms of lawsuit cheerleaders. Far too many people are assuming that just because a lawsuit was filed, and we're the good guys, it's a given that the judge will rule in our favor on both the binding issue and charges of harassment, etc.
The binding issue should have been left out considering that:
a) we have RNC decisions going all the way back to 1961, and as recent as the last presidential election cycle, that clearly indicate state binding rules are of no effect at the convention and therefore national delegates can vote their preference, and
b) if the court decides against us, that delegates must vote according to their state binding rules, there could be hundreds of delegates who support Ron Paul but will have to vote for someone else. They'll be "cut off at the knees", as you said.
Ron Paul - Honorary Founding Father
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: