Comment: John didn't take the bait.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Fill me in (see in situ)

John didn't take the bait.

Jan's method is to get you to contradict yourself when you give two different answers to the same question asked in two different ways. CNN is notorious for hit pieces and spin machines that shape public opinion, by him saying that he has no opinions is playing it safe. But it also raises the question why he works for a company that doesn't have any shame forming opinions when he tries to act like a legitimate journalist. Jan is a smart man, he dissects many layers of thinking and boxes you into an answer that needs to be explained on many levels. For instance, one of he previous interviews he asked if taxation is voluntary, Michael Steele answered yes. Is it voluntary if force is used to make you pay by threat of imprisonment?