The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: The legal tradition (which I
The legal tradition (which I
The legal tradition (which I think Jefferson promoted) is that IP must be novel, create new function, and be non-obvious. That means that improvements to existing ideas are possible but must be demonstrated to provide new functionality and be non-obvious which means taking a machine and essentially improving it to the point of creating new functionality. Jefferson discusses this very issue in a letter because he had the same concern. He believed a change needed to be a substantial improvement to receive a patent.
Replies to this comment: