Comment: But if he disagrees with the

(See in situ)


But if he disagrees with the

But if he disagrees with the pork in the first place, why even add it to the bill? Isn't that hypocrisy?

$398 million is a lot of pork that he himself tacked on. What, we don't hold him culpable just because he voted against it?

I don't buy it. By your logic, Joseph Goebbels is innocent because he never personally killed anybody.