Comment: Hyperbole

"As always I appreciate as always your viewpoint."

Always is a figure of speech, I trust, not intending to mean absolute forever on into eternity.

I appreciate your viewpoint more than you may ever know, for reasons that may never be accurately communicated but that is fine, some things are meant to be and other things are not, and all that is out of my power.

God allows me to know some things and I can claim to know these things as being true. Finding other people who see these things too, in books, in person, through this medium of exchange we call The Internet, can be seen by me as a way that God, or the Truth, gives me a sense of value in my being so active in finding these specific things that I think are worth knowing better.

Few, very few, people are even asking questions, and few still, in my opinion, are asking vital questions, and fewer still are finding accurate answers, again in my opinion.

You are not only asking questions, you are asking vital questions, and you are obviously not settling for inaccurate answers since, as a matter of fact, settling for an inaccurate answer confesses a false desire to know the truth - or perhaps it is not a matter of fact, but that is my trust in truth as far as my poor Spiritual Connection allows me to confirm said truth.

The thing about honest people is that trust can actually be a powerful thing, rather than being a liability.

"Just let gravity, a law of nature = money competition,"

If there were a sudden realization over night by everyone with few exceptions (the exceptions already know) concerning POWER commanded by individuals then the revolution is what we all wake up to this morning. The PEOPLE take over, or the meek inherit the earth, as all the other words, like democracy, and government, and anarchy, are rendered less meaningful in direct competition with this now active POWER commanded by each individual who now knows better than to settle for FALSE FRONTS, or pretenders to some throne of authority over anyone else, whereby that pretender is falsely raised above anyone else, when no such thing is true, not unless that someone is Jesus returning or God returning and who, anywhere, is claiming to be this exceptional God above man?

Not you.

Not me.

But take any Legal Criminal and know, sure you know, any criminal with or without a badge, raises him or her self above their victim, as a False God, a pretender to the throne, and POWER is stolen, POWER is transferred, and it is past time for all the potential victims to opt out of that whole mess, and there are plenty of competitive options already provided to us, by our ancestors, our contemporaries, or even the real God, Jesus, the real deal, really does help us know better.

Each individual, by definition, offers a competitive example of everything to everyone else, and why would anyone ever want to crush any offers by anyone?

Liberty = competition

Legal Crime = Monopoly

Power produced into oversupply is competitively better for each individual compared to power crushed into a condition of scarcity.

Only the non-competitors, only the monopolists, only the Legal Criminals seek to crush competition, to crush individual power supplies, to make power scarce, and they do so, the Criminals do so, because they are then, by those actions, the only ones who get the power over power and they then jack up the price of power to anyone who will do anything to get enough power to survive, or to keep their children alive, or to join in on all The Legal Crime for fun and profit at the expense of all the targeted victims.

Power produced into oversupply, assuming that Legal Criminal connections can be severed and avoided by the former victims, reduces the price of power.

Who, look around, who do you know who wants higher food prices?

Who wants higher electricity prices?

Who wants higher water prices?

Who wants higher transportation prices?

All those things are forms of actual life giving power.

Who wants higher defense against crime prices?

Who wants higher insurance prices?

Who wants higher taxes?

What is the more competitive want?

A.
I want higher taxes, higher water prices, higher food prices, lower quality insurance, lower quality water, lower quality food, because that is how I get my profits, that is how I earn my living, and I am willing, able, ready, and currently resorting to deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence upon the innocent to keep my power over these sources of power that everyone needs.

B.
I want lower taxes, higher quality insurance against all crimes, lower food prices, and I'm willing to work for food, and higher food quality, etc.

Which is the competitive viewpoint? Which is the monopoly viewpoint?

Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases.

Here is where ONE MONEY works the same way as many different monies work to force money quality up and cost down, it does not matter, so long as the person understanding the way things work understands that the unit of value is held constant long enough to know that the cause of any increases or decreases of power are not caused by the increase or decrease in the number of units of money.

So here is where Purchasing Power becomes very complicated to someone who is not familiar with The Business Cycle (Psycho) and how Legal Criminals double the number of units of money and then subtract half of the units of money so as to cause BOOMS and BUSTS and therefore to have inside information on when to sell, because they know when prices will be highest, and they know when to buy, when prices will be lowest, because they cause those man-made fluctuations in market prices that way, by doing that exact thing that exact way.

So you have to fix the unit of value to something, some standard measure of value, of some kind, if you are going to understand the relationship of POWER and MONEY, actual POWER, and actual Purchasing POWER (money).

Money isn't money if it has no power to purchase. So what is the amount of power to purchase with a specific money unit, anything, so long as you know that measure of that unit of POWER TO PURCHASE so as to know what happens to that amount of POWER when other POWER is increased, made abundant, and prices go down because other POWER is abundant.

Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power WHILE PURCHASING POWER INCREASES...

That is not a competitive viewpoint. That is fact. There are obvious measurable reasons why that is fact but know that it is fact easily.

If Legal Crime is opted out and if power is used to make more power, and more power, and more power, and power runs like sunlight, or power runs like water on a very rainy day, then the price of power will reduce from where power is priced while power is scarce to the price of power once power is abundant, once Legal Crime is bypassed by enough people to actually constitute enough power to make power abundant. The price goes down.

Power today, because it is scarce, is a food bill, an electric bill, an insurance bill (tax), a water bill, a transportation fuel bill, a mortgage bill, a money storage bill (plus or minus) to name a few POWER bills that are high because power is made scarce on purpose as competitors are systematically crushed by the monopoly power.

Power once power is abundant will be less pricey.

If you work and earn X amount of income today then that is a measure of your Purchasing Power, roughly fixed, as X, today, that is it, that is enough to know for now, without any other external calculation concerning the value of the unit of money used by you or anyone else.

Power before abundant power is allowed is HIGH today while your purchasing power is X, so power is then made abundant, and we keep Purchasing Power known to be X, so that we know the effect on X without having X mysteriously fluctuating in value, keep it at X, for now, so as to know what happens when the other factors go up and down, we are solving for X, and X is X, not X - Y (your earnings cut in half by The FED when they double the money supply).

Power price after power is allowed to be produced competitively and therefore abundantly is LOWER than it is today after that increase of production happens.

Your Income is X today, and you pay all those POWER bills today.

You wake up in the future, but your income is the same (fixed) for purposes of knowing how your Fixed Power to Purchase will be affected by abundant power being less pricy.

Power is less pricy, your power to purchase increases, because now you pay less for power and you have more power to spare.

Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of producing.

Every single producer of anything now has a lower tax bill, a lower water bill, a lower electric bill, a lower food bill, a lower net POWER bill, so every single producer can cut prices and stay in business against any competitor who can't cut prices because they are still "providing the means by which we suffer".

I hope that helps.

"Just let gravity, a law of nature = money competition, do its work by disconnecting from the jar = the legal criminal money monopoly; and the prize = power over produced will fall out of the jar when it is turned upside down for we the people to enjoy the reduced cost of power thus being able to purchase more for less."

Gravity as an analogy for competition works because human nature, as God made it, is to choose life instead of choosing death. There are exceptions, mutations, evil people who choose to kill for fun and profit, but the default, or the working design is to choose higher quality life, at a lower cost, instead of lower quality life at a higher cost, which is a gravity of life, a force that must be there or all hell breaks loose. What would happen if God, or some person, or some thing, switched off all gravity everywhere?

What would happen, if tomorrow morning, everyone woke up with a desire to make life worse and cost more?

What would you do waking up without that design, that gravity, that need for better and lower in cost turned up-side-down? Wake up and punch your husband in the nose, kick the dog, throw the kids out into the street, then jump off the roof so as to break your own legs?

"I hope I didn't take too much liberty and butcher the truth of Joe's Law: Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production."

It is what it is, does what it does, and seeing it either happens or doesn't happen. I see it.

"Do you think Joel Skousen offers a competitive view on war with China/Russia?"

I'll check that out.

Thanks again.

Note: Joel Skousen may know a lot more than I do as to which people are planning actual plans to reset World Reserve Currency Headquarters (from The Dollar Hegemony to The World Bank I suppose), including the use of Nuclear Weapons on targets in America. I think he has it right on principle, or I have it right, as the obvious need to keep conflict going after World War III (Legal Crime needs to divide the victims at every level) appears to be our mutual understanding.

I don't think that everyone will be looking at The World Bank as the ONE group of most powerful bad guys, so China will probably end up as being The World Economic Dictators (that is what we are now), the bad guys (we are the bad guys now), not The World Bank, and not The U.N., and not The New World Order, but China will be the bad guys with Chinese money as the most powerful version of Fraud Money, and Russian may or may not be partners for awhile, and then enemies for awhile, in that order, but the principles are measurably apparent to me too.

The most powerful few may or may not include someone stupid enough to employ nuclear weapons, or even, at that moment, not be powerful enough to stop one of the psychopaths who does gain access to those launch protocols and getting past any cooler head that could get in the way in time.

I would not trust reports by anyone saying that there is a plan by the Russians or the Chinese to nuke America. It does not even sound right to me to say that Russia does not have the technology, that sounds contradictory in principle. Russians don't do aggressive wars for profit in history, they do internal self-destruction and are very good at defense. China, is the same, they do self-destruction very well, and they are very good at repelling invaders eventually.

The message sounds self contradictory. It won't be the Russians and Chinese calling the shots (World Bank does) and it will be the Russians and Chinese calling the shots when they get enough technology. If the most powerful people, the ones who have the most power, this is a factual statement, there are the most powerful people, I'm not one, you are not one, they do exist, and they have enough power to get any technology, that makes them by that measure the most powerful, so why are they waiting to get that which they already have?