The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser t


Comment: Do you have any quotes or
Do you have any quotes or
Do you have any quotes or writings from the framers of the 16th amendment that would indicate that the meaning really was what you say, and that it was not intended to allow Congress to apply an income tax as it now does? I mean, a huge part of the argument by Ron Paul and his supporters is that the founders did not intend for certain clauses (General welfare, interstate commerce, necessary and proper, etc) of the Constitution to authorize all the stuff that Congress does. Contortion of those words without regard for the original meaning is what has allowed all these laws and programs to be approved. So in a discussion on the meaning of the 16th Amendment, shouldn't we likewise refer to what the people who wrote the amendment meant for it to mean?