The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise her


Comment: Bring back trial by combat
Bring back trial by combat
I've said this for about 20 years. Adding comment so I can find it in my archive.
Technically, trial by combat is not dead because it isn't dueling. Every once in awhile, you'll see a newspaper article with the government finding this out, because it is a common law right.
Trial by combat is more important than dueling. Dueling is about honor, but trial by combat is about an even more fundamental right that you always have a right to protect yourself and not get mobbed. When you have trial by combat, 51% of the people can't decide to take away your rights as a mob, because you have the right to challenge your specific accuser - the prosecutor representing the fictional "state", to combat.
As a side note, the term "craven coward" comes from trial by combat.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.
Replies to this comment: