Comment: You may (now) be making Mises' argument,...

In post: Liberty Movement Is Returning Back To A Bunch Of Fiefdoms

In reply to comment: I'm sorry -- I'm making Mises' argument (see in situ)

You may (now) be making Mises' argument,...

Submitted by Chuqfu on Wed, 07/04/2012 - 14:08. Permalink

...but whether it be Mises' argument, or an argument for Individualism, or one for non-proselytization (the response to which was my original post), you continue implicitly to claim the Inductive Principle, which is the foundation for all of your language use.

Now, make your language use i.e. your implicit claim that reasoning from particulars to generalities is warranted i.e. your use of Induction, intelligible to me.

I don't think you can do it with what is apparently a limited ontology (i.e. belief system about what is).

—

Charles Jackson
http://MathIsChristian.wordpress.com Also, read Ron Paul's original staff economist Gary North at http://teapartyeconomist.com/