The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I said this above, and I'll
I said this above, and I'll
I said this above, and I'll try and apply it to this situation. The ONLY situation where "IP" should be protected is in the event that someone purports to be a company that they are not. I cannot open a store with golden arches and call it mcdonalds if it isnt really mcdonalds.
Here...its more tricky.
If the guy is purporting the shirts to be something that is made or sanctioned by the NFL, then I'd say the NFL has a case. But if he clearly makes the claim that his shirts are not in anyway sanctioned created made or distributed by the NFL and that his shirt merely has the image of the saints on it...its hard to say.
But the theory I'm using is an application of a standard libertarian idea, that fraud is illegal.
23