The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: He did answer the question.
He did answer the question.
He said it is not theft because there is no promise on the face of the FRN that it will maintain its value. In other words caveat emptor notwithstanding we have no choice but to use the counterfeit notes issued by our central banks.
I have never heard this argument before so Krugman must have come up with it after some deep deliberation having been faced with the question several times.
It is however not true that there is no promise that the currency will maintain its value. That was indeed part of the original contract when there was still a link to gold and even now it is stated in the terms of the mandate the Fed has to maintain stable prices and low unemployment. Stable prices means maintenance of the purchasing power of the FRN to my way of thinking. Of course that is a patently ridiculous objective given the nature of the system and simply an indication of how much these people have lost touch with reality.
"The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son does remain forever. So if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed." (John 8:35-36)