Comment: What facts are wrong? Was it

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Totally agree. (see in situ)

What facts are wrong? Was it

What facts are wrong? Was it or was it a "UNANIMOUS" (that includes Rand) consent requirement? Not even the Rand defenders can agree on how to explain this. Some are even admitting the vote, but rationalizing it as support for a "loan" not a subsidy.