... especially since the DP portion of that "legal advice" was predominantly coming from non-lawyers who were mixing the advice with their own fervent expressions of pro-Paul support. If you followed that whole sorry episode on the two main threads, Shazad, you will recall what my response was at the time.
Regarding encouraging Liberty delegates to break their pledge to support a particular (non-Paul) candidate, I think that we Liberty Movement supporters should take a deep breath and reflect on whether Dr. Paul would consider it honorable for a delegate to swear falsely in order to be in a position to vote for Paul. From what I know of the man, I don't think that Dr. Paul would want someone to do that.
As I have said before, Shazad, I fully expect that the Paul campaign will entreat the pro-Paul delegates in Tampa to respect their bound status.
A Constitutional, Christian conservative who voted for Ron and stands with Rand