Comment: Yes, emotional reasoning

is very often employed and now the public thinks such reasoning is normal and okay.

Here is what is interesting.

Human beings defining constitutional intent in ways that makes them the "masters of congress and the courts" is also emotional reasoning. The very best emotions however.

Constitutional intent is natural law. Natural law is our instinct. Emotions are instinctual.

Since we do not have free speech, we do not know the kind of communication that evokes positive speech which is also emotional. Positive speech that is emotional creates unity.

That is why free speech is abridged, so we do not use it to create unity and oppose the infiltrations of government.