Comment: I accept they're normal people

What I don't accept (together with the continuation of names calling) for obvious reasons is that a homosexual marriage is a normal type of marriage.

I firmly believe that one of the primary reasons of the heterosexual marriage is to protect the children from such marriage - also in regard to the property rights - if for example one or both die (which everybody eventually) the children inherit his/her/their property, which would not happen if you're for example a rich guy fu*king a poor girl, having children with her and then eventually leave her with the children alone, die and the children will not get a penny. The ages when it was like this notoriously - and girls for very obvious reasons refused sexual relationaships with such guys and were strongly discouraged to do so without marriage - are not so far in the past yet somehow the libertarians in America have the selective amnesia.

The heterosexual marriage clearly is a contract for offspring posterity in both practical and legal sense and the homosexuals for obvious reasons cannot have own posterity so there is no property rights reason for them to have a marriage in the first place. The partial property rights problems - as for example a homosexual pair living in a house, which one of them owns, the one dies and the other is chased out can simply be resolved by mutual ownership contract and/or last will testament - you don't need to solve it by a marriage.

Also there is clearly a LGBT agenda to legalize children adoptions by homosexual pairs - which in normal circumstances of normal homosexual pairs is usually allowed in a case they're in a stable marriage where the children can expect an inheritance - so clearly there evidently exists a reason for homosexuals - having alot to do with the kids - to push for instituting homosexual marriage - a reason even much stronger than in the case of heterosexuals (for them to get children can be a question of 5 minutes of pleasant intimous activity and they don't need anybody to it) and it is either a result of selective blindness of the fanatical American libertarians not to see it, or it could of course be a direct mendacious demagoguery - to claim that the reason isn't there and never was.
I don't even wonder the vast majority of heterosexuals does not want homosexual marriages and adoptions - I would also not want the children to be given to and fostered by people leaving themselves to be advocated by selective blinds or demagogues.