"...I wonder how they would do this or how extreme they would get with it."
Are you paranoid, or trying to create paranoia? Who is "they". Why generalize?
"Let's say someone has bad behavior as a child and the parent gets him help. Would he be banned as an adult? Would someone seeking mental help because they went through a divorce be banned? Would a person that goes to an AA group or a grief counseling group be banned? Would everyone have to have their entire medical record searched first exposing information very personal that has nothing to do with mental health? The list goes on and things are always taken to the extreme."
Looks very much like you are trying to make people afraid of simply having effective mental health care available. That is all I suggest.
I made the proposal to government health care because they have reduced liability and private doctors are afraid.
"What people don't realize is that people who are sick or criminals will always find a way to obtain what they are looking for. It would just be the 1st step in raping more privacy & rights from good people."
"Just-tify" your suggestion that the availability of effective mental health care would be a way of "raping more privacy & rights from good people."
Maybe you work for the nwo and the effect of this treatment is the exact reverse of what you suggest because occasionally people with mental health problems might remember things that indicate secret gov programmed them. And, of course, if such things are happening, secret government does not want people to know that deprogramming from depression, anxiety, anger, grief etc. actually works; because if it does, the reverse could work too.
Can we stop doing all the things we are doing that we do not want to do while still doing what we need to do?