The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Did I say "moral" or talk about "morality"
Did I say "moral" or talk about "morality"
There is NO SUCH thing as "just war" -- There are sides, yes, and both believe they are in the right -- whether the long-run right or the short-run right.
History has shown that might makes right.
WWII was not black-n-white -- it was just sold that way.
Either two camps of wealthy people fought each other (ideologically) -- meaning there was winners and losers (financially) at the end -OR- most all wealthy people "made out" well (regardless the country or ideology).
Regardless it's always wealthy people fighting the way that benefits them.
Same is true for any "civil-war" and they can always (according to all world history) find sell-outs in the lower ranks to aid them in "take-over" or "regime-change"
Besides your argument shows that "hostile takeover" cannot happen owing to reasons beyond guns in the hands of civilians.
*&^ Constitution --- Constitutional Rationality
Replies to this comment: