The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: You are assuming too much
You are assuming too much
You over-trivialized what I said in an earlier post by saying I do not care if Romney hadn't paid taxes in 10 years. Of course that would be unacceptable (even though I think our current tax code is a travesty anyway), however there is a stark difference between revealing he has evaded taxes for 10 years or spending an entire campaign cycle attacking someone over refusing to release additional tax returns.
I have plenty of issues with Mitt Romney, but you cannot keep saying over and over again in your argument that he hasn't paid taxes in years and provide no evidence. Further, do you have evidence that he is closely tied to the Federal Reserve Board? Not everyone who works on Wall Street, or more specifically in private equity, is evil.
My own father has worked on Wall Street for 25 years and happens to be an outspoken critic of our monetary policy. When you continually attack a major section of our economy, as private equity is a key industry in terms of capital formation, redeployment, and investment...then you start to sound quite similar to Nancy Pelosi.
Even Ron Paul had to defend private equity when other politicians started calling it "vulture capitalism" during the primaries, remember?
Replies to this comment: