Comment: "Loyalty Oath?"

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Rand Paul has explained (see in situ)

"Loyalty Oath?"

Excuse me Granger, but can you tell me how this "loyalty oath" is supposed to work?

My understanding is that when Rand was sworn in as a US Senator, he swore a loyalty oath to the CONSTITUTION:

do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Please tell me more about this "loyalty oath" he supposedly took to support the Republican presidential nominee - who was unknown to him at the time of taking the oath. Is that oath somehow higher than his oath to the Constitution?

Tell me Granger, is Rand Paul's oath to Mitt Romney higher than his oath to the Constitution? Rand's oath to Romney, who, when asked when asked whether he would need the approval of Congress to go to war, said he would "consult his lawyers?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIRlNUqEdlU

Which allegiance is higher, Granger? Oath to Party or Oath to Family? Oath to Family, or Oath to the Constitution?

You can rationalize it any way you like, but when you look into your heart, you know that Ron Paul is right: "Just read the Constitution."

And if Ron Paul is right, then Rand Paul, by pledging his allegiance to Mitt Romney, is wrong.

allegory - ˈalɪg(ə)ri/ - noun - 1. a story, poem, or picture which can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning, typically a moral or political one.