Comment: He is no terrorist

(See in situ)

He is no terrorist

They are trying to control the language. If they can control the language it allows for them to define all circumstances as extreme circumstances and they have already been able to gain extreme powers under circumstances we were lulled into thinking would only be 'extreme' it is we looked the other way and gave them power they never should have had in specific matters of 'terrorism'. Now we see them define 'terrorism' any way they want.

The 'Batman Shooter' and the 'Sikh Temple Shooter' have been disingenuously refered to as 'Domestic Terrorists' yet they can not be aptly classfied as 'Terrorists' because the violence they brought was not accompanied by any promulgations. This is a twisting of the language to fit the designs of tyranny.

Any promulgations on Facebook, whether they call for violence or not, can not be aptly classified as terrorism unless there is violence to go along with those promulgations. Ergo, Brandon Raub is not a terrorist unless we stand silent as the power of our language is stolen from us right before our very eyes.

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. - Margaret Mead