















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Its a Thoery
Its a Thoery
I know its hard for you to grasp because its more like an algebraic equation then plain evidence. But once you put all the variables in the sequence its easier to understand.
I'm not going into interest rates or who knows economics better. I'm talking about simple algebra. My conclusion comes from answering the question (why would they create an influx of money 30 years ago to today). Why do you think they did it? You already know what I think. You must have some theory of why the did this.
Here's Ron Paul basically saying what I was saying about a few people and families being in control, not even Congress.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDEgBWO54dA
They decide how much money is in circulation because they are the big banks tied to the Federal Reserve. This only leaves my theory as true, they know how much money was out there and they did not want to use what they had in their accounts so they made more money.
"If you think we can't change the world, it just means you're not one of those that will"
Jacque Fresco
Replies to this comment: