Comment: disinfo?

(See in situ)


that's a bit of a stretch don't you think? Your disagreements with liberty chat seem to be about campaign strategy and his view on Paul's chances to land a surprise victory at the convention.

From where I'm sitting it seems like the website was created by a supporter who is intending to be "realistic", not disingenuous, whether you agree with his perspective or not.

Suggesting we band together to attack a fellow Ron Paul supporter with little to no evidence of true 'disinfo' is the wrong approach... especially if you believe in private property and free speech. If his articles / site content is bad, nobody will visit the site and it will fade into obscurity on it's own.

Suggesting any form of malicious retaliation is not what we do. We are supposed to be advocating peaceful change through critical thought, not forceful change with the lack of evidence. That strategy is reserved for the bastards we are fighting against.

If you disagree with the site's content you have 2 choices: 1) Leave liberty chat and never return 2) Email, post, and otherwise express your view, and if you treat them with respect, sometimes people will come around to your way of thinking. That one I learned from watching Dr. Paul change hearts and minds over the last 30 years.

- Grow Mushrooms at Home