The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Involuntary commitment
Involuntary commitment
is the law in most states when a person is deemed to be a danger to himself or others. Mental health professionals are required to warn specific persons when they perceive there is direct threat to them by an unstable individual. That is the law. I could tell you countless examples of families being extremely frustrated with the MH system for NOT exercising in-voluntary commitment, when they believe their relative is in serious jeopardy and their own lives may be in danger. The system errs on the side of freedom as it should.
Involuntary commitment is VERY difficult to get because of the civil rights concerns. It is likely that after the Batman case, the Family Research Council case and the other recent episodes of mentally ill people shooting innocent people, that the government is applying over-caution.
The average run of the mill, harmless lunatic is not in danger of being locked up, although there are obviously abuses of power.
Replies to this comment: