Comment: I downvote you too

You clearly have not much idea neither about psychiatry ethics in context of civil rights nor what the whole thing is about.

Brandon Raub would be much better off if people like you would not try to justify severe violations of civil rights with your blabber about “need of good therapy” and “positive aspects of life”. In fact after evaluation of his interview with Adam Kokesh it is absolutely clear to me that Brandon Raub doesn't need help of any mental health professionals - eager to acquire power over peoples minds for their petty business - and any their illegitimate interference with his life at all.

I'm also a mental health professional moreover with special expertise in the field which is relevant here (political extremism) and I don't find anything problematic with his statements and there's absolutely clearly no justification for involuntary commitment present, because, clearly, no dangerous medical condition was present much less an immediate one.

Your country is in very severe crisis where it arguably got with the Bush militaristic regime, so it is absolutely understandable people don't like him and I don't see anything troublesome on any possible remarks about somebody who is a wanted war criminal and who arguably caused death of really many children in multiple countries in the course of illegal undeclared wars (and I especially don't see anything troublesome on it in the country with the freedom of speech rights guaranteed both in the federal and state constitutions) and although of course he is not the only one to blame he is as the commander in chief at the time the one chiefly responsible.

Moreover the whole collusion of the FBI, Secret Service, State and local authorities with the mental health professionals to lock Mr. Raub up for some remarks on Facebook, which really hardly can be a probable cause for the involuntary commitment, look extremely much like the Conspiracy against rights (a federal capital crime under USC title 18 Part I Chapter 13 §241) - so indeed he is there arguably a subject of "conspirational exposure", but it is clearly in the first place the fault of the mental health professionals who participate in his clearly severely illegitimate detention - as is the very known tactics to eliminate political opposition in totalitarian regimes.

In fact the violent criminal overreaction of the system clearly proves Mr. Raub is right it is evil. So please don't try your demagoguery that saying it publicly and repeatedly is "problematic", even clearly trying to back it up with your alleged credentials. Telling truth is not problematic except for those who for obvious or less obvious reasons don't want it revealed.