The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I think worthiness is a bad
I think worthiness is a bad
I think worthiness is a bad metric to determine if one wants to enter negotiations or not. Cause it has nothing to do with winning.
I agree that it's bad to compromise too much, but in the end we still have to win a bit more than the opposition. Because if we lose more than they do, they'll get more powerful, while we get weaker.
Now, if sticking to our guns means winning more in the future, I'm all for it. But I'm wondering, how do you envision us winning more battles by zero negotiations this time around? How will this allow us to win more?
Replies to this comment: