I think worthiness is a bad metric to determine if one wants to enter negotiations or not. Cause it has nothing to do with winning.
I agree that it's bad to compromise too much, but in the end we still have to win a bit more than the opposition. Because if we lose more than they do, they'll get more powerful, while we get weaker.
Now, if sticking to our guns means winning more in the future, I'm all for it. But I'm wondering, how do you envision us winning more battles by zero negotiations this time around? How will this allow us to win more?
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent th