The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Here's what I'm trying to say (and have been saying)
Here's what I'm trying to say (and have been saying)
for years now.
Consumer-Sovereignty (as Mises - RP's Mentor - has pointed out) is when you rule via the POS (point of sale) -- your "daily dollar vote"
Only then, when no one can interfere wit the daily dollar vote, can you maintain a free-society.
What is interference?
---As RP and Mises point out:
1) War
2) Theft
3) Laws or Regulation that circumvent consumer-will
Individualism is when everyone rules.
Totalitarianism is when one or a few rule
---Monarch
---Dictator
---Pharoah
---Noblemen
---Caste System
Corporatism is when everyone "thinks" they rule via electorate
Voting and Lobbying is Perpetual War
1) It is an abdication of consumer-rule
---to rule via ballot box rather than POS)
2) The decisions the elected candidate will
---to disrupt the consumptive decisions of
Voting and Lobbying are "false" economic-goods
1) They do not exist (ballot box wise) in a free-society
---A free-society being a place where gov't cannot circumvent consumer will
2) Wars are only EVER fought over false-market-demand goods
---The demand for drugs, fuel, metals, agriculture are not played out in free-market demand; we fight wars to fulfill false-demand-curves and to drive controlled profitability for the entitled-rich.
Voting and Lobbying (the very act) grows gov't power
1) The profits made by elections alone
2) Increase in political war chests
---which increases the sell-out potential value
Ron Paul said (paraphrase) "you cannot produce a free-society at the barrel of a gun -- free-trade is the vehicle to ensure a libertarian outcome"
Lobbying is Bribery -- Quite literally. The vote is to get the guy in office but the lobbying is to ensure his future voting trends. It's a pay-off, hahaha.
War is simply consumptive-control -- either to increase ones consumptive choices or to control or decrease another's.
We must "trade" (as RP implies) and not "war" if we want a free-society.
Therefore voting and lobbying (being an act of war) is the OPPOSITE activity to foster free-trade.
Simple deduction my dear Watson *wink*
*&^ Constitution --- Constitutional Rationality