I agree with you. But Romney and the establishment don't, so they're going to do what they think is the best strategy. I think their reasoning is plain enough, based on their statements and actions. I was just trying to answer the question of "why?" not "should they?".
So, should they? No, of course not, they ought to nominate Ron Paul in his place. Convincing them of that is a challenge, though...
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: