Comment: thoroughly debunked here:

(See in situ)


Joη's picture

thoroughly debunked here:

http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/Cmabrigde/

For example, the mind is hopelessly lost with this sentence of anagrammatic words:

The sherpas had pintos and petals.

because it could also be:

The shapers had points and pleats.
The seraphs had pitons and plates.
The sphears had potins and peltas.

etc

"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it." | Up for a game?