Comment: I got it right here:

In post: IMPORTANT: If RNC insists Maine Convention was held improperly then there was NO Convention and Mitt is OFF the state ballot

In reply to comment: No he would not be on the ballot (see in situ)

I got it right here:

Submitted by samadamscw on Mon, 09/03/2012 - 22:56. Permalink

from the OP:

"in order to have the party designation of its candidates printed on the ballot "

It says nothing about not being on the ballot at all, it says that the party designation will not be printed on the ballot.

What part of that plain English escapes you?

Login to post comments

Originals
Ask DP
Video
Project
Idea
Quicklink

The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer

© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here