Comment: I didn't change the

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Take it away huh lol (see in situ)

I didn't change the

I didn't change the analogy... I showed how it's the same choice with different opinion.

You think he's one of "3 evils" and I don't. He's not great, he doesn't understand libertarianism (neither of the other candidates do either), but that doesn't make him an "evil" candidate.

I think you're exaggerating his lack of understanding to be much worse than it is when it comes down to it.

If you're not a "Ron Paul Fanboy", than you're a "libertarian philosophy fanboy". You're willing to discredit the good things about someone that WOULD help the country because they don't meet your libertarian standards.

Being a fanboy is bad in regards to anything.

You're willing to sabotage the chance of positive things happening because he's not libertarian. Like I said... your choice.

Maybe I should change the part in the post to just "fanboy".

I can't see anyone, not even someone in love with libertarian philosophy, that sabotages the potential for positive and much needed change, as libertarian.

Critical Thinking > Emotional Thinking > Pseudo-Intellectuals that Saturate DP
Utilitarianism > Consequentialism > Deontology > Egocentrism
Making people feel "troll'd" with the truth > being an intentional troll > acting like one naturally