Comment: What I was saying is that GJ

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Huh? (see in situ)

What I was saying is that GJ

What I was saying is that GJ panders to Israel. To me that suggests that GJ is likely to be persuaded and is NOT the torch carrier of the liberty movement. Most Paul supporters like myself are not willing to budge on our stance on foreign policy.

I think you misunderstood me. Not sure how.