Comment: Speaking Out for the Voiceless

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Good Grief (see in situ)

Speaking Out for the Voiceless

So what you are saying is people are going to murder their babies let us make it safe for the murderers if they happen to choose to murder?

Who speaks for the unborn? It is ok for them to be murdered in clean hygenic settings by professionals paid by my tax dollars?

Hmmmm, how about a gun ban so lone gunmen can shoot up coffee shops or enter homes without the risk of getting shot.

IMO There is a big difference between putting a drug in your own body and a knife or coat hanger into someone else's. (I am speaking of the baby's who has no choice.)

Yes, Ron Paul said it was a state's issue, but his platform says this:

As a physician, Ron Paul consistently put his beliefs into practice and saved lives by helping women seek options other than abortion, including adoption. And as President, Ron Paul will continue to fight for the same pro-life solutions he has upheld in Congress, including:

* Immediately saving lives by effectively repealing Roe v. Wade and preventing activist judges from interfering with state decisions on life by removing abortion from federal court jurisdiction through legislation modeled after his “We the People Act.”

* Defining life as beginning at conception by passing a “Sanctity of Life Act.”

He wanted to pass a sanctity of life act. Just what would that have been?


I understand that the life issue is dividing voting blocks. I think that is why it is still an issue. The Repubs and the Dems know it divides us so the issue has not been resolved on purpose. But that does not mean that it has to be resolved to allow murder to be legal. Why don't we just decide non whites are no longer human either. I seem to remember that being an issue...and it sounds absolutely rediculous that anyone would have argued it.


I suppose I am being a little pushy, I am sorry, but I guess my buttons have been pushed!