Comment: What is more sickening?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: An embryo is a potential person (see in situ)

What is more sickening?

What is more sickening? A baby in a bucket gasping to breathe...a bloody baby in a bucket not breathing...a dismembered baby in a bucket not breathing... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkAsLPrnJGc&feature=player_em...

Or how about newborns being killed:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9113394/Killing... :

"The article, entitled “After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?”, was written by two of Prof Savulescu’s former associates, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.

They argued: “The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.”

Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential persons”. They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’."

Or how about just the handicapped? http://www.wnd.com/2006/09/37903/

Or how about just the girls: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5953508

You must know that these are the current conversations now that abortion is no longer an issue...

The other end of the spectum is how old do you need to be to no longer be viable? 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100?