Comment: You convincing yourself it's

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: One Principle, No Conflict. (see in situ)

You convincing yourself it's

You convincing yourself it's only one principle is exactly the same justification used as an excuse that I mentioned.

Your TWO Principles
Principle A: Vote for only people that don't violate NAP
OR
Principle B: Promote liberty, the movement, positive things for the country, and all the potential good that could happen as listed in the post.

You choose to stick to your extremely high standard (only accepting people as good as Ron Paul)
OVER
all of the good things that would happen for every one, including yourself, with getting behind Johnson.

One is the moral high ground and one is easier for you to do and in turn selfish instead of principled.

Unless promoting liberty to its full potential (as explained) isn't one of your principles... you have two and they conflict... whether you want to admit it or not.

Critical Thinking > Emotional Thinking > Pseudo-Intellectuals that Saturate DP
Utilitarianism > Consequentialism > Deontology > Egocentrism
Making people feel "troll'd" with the truth > being an intentional troll > acting like one naturally