Comment: You must have

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Non-Aggression Principle (see in situ)

You must have

comprehended my comment incorrectly. I meant "Just like you (as in how you will not be voting for Rand Paul if he is on the ballot in 2016)Republicans will not be voting for GJ. I gatherd you were not a repub, and my whole comment was about repubs and LP's go at eachother, yet have so much in common. Yes, Rand's Sanctions vote hurt, but I may pull the lever for him in 2016, just like I may pull the lever for GJ in Nov. It all comes down to what is best for the country, not any single party imo. Johnson sounds good, but when he opens his mouth when it comes to FP, he sounds like he is saying what he is told to say, or saying what he thinks the people want to hear. Tough choices to make, and the only way one will see a pure candidate on the ballot is to run themselves.

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James