I made a valid point.
You are CHOOSING to feel good about yourself OVER there being LESS blood being spilled at all.
You're using circular logic to feel like you have no responsibility when your reasoning is flawed. You're choosing the easy route.
If you're sabotaging the possibility of there being less spilled blood... doesn't the difference between what would've been spilled and what will be spilled end up on your hands?
Your vote for Johnson = Less Blood Spilled
Your vote for no one or Ron Paul (in turn for Obamney) = The same if not more Blood Spilled
Your "I'm clean" vote where Obama or Romney win - "Less Blood Spilled" vote where Johnson at least has a chance = the amount of blood that's on your hands.
Critical Thinking > Emotional Thinking > Pseudo-Intellectuals that Saturate DP
Utilitarianism > Consequentialism > Deontology > Egocentrism
Making people feel "troll'd" with the truth > being an intentional troll > acting like one naturally