Who uses the power they steal to make their power to steal more powerful?
My wife and I are speaking to each other in the car and she has a lot of irons in the fire, dealing with Bank (a competitive bank UNDER ONE MONOPOLY BANK dividing the competitors and conquering them) employees who are actually middle men, contractors, and ultimately there are people moving from the home that someone says they can no longer afford, and my wife says:
And they are getting a lawyer because they say that the Bank did not threat them right.
And I say, well, I hope things go well (to a Jury Trial) and they get to stay in their home for free.
My wife responds with, no, only the Lawyers will win, these people will have to move, one way or the other.
And I think, that is a familiar story, since, if you can know, my brother is in Hinkley, and there are lawyers pounding the pavement, smelling blood, like Erin Brockovich, who in the movie appears to be a hero, sure, but a very well paid hero.
Because equity is made scarce on purpose. Anyone seeking a redress of grievance, needing it desperately, is willing to pay a very high price for the counterfeit version, and then they are left even weaker, having paid too much for nothing, and now the Law Power turns into Lawful Crime, and worse that getting nothing for something.
The Few have figured out how to make what they do Legal, while they employ themselves in the work of punishing everyone else, who, as victims, are trying desperately to copy the example (might makes right), failing miserably, and are therefore trampled under foot, with Jack Boots on them.
If you can afford to be a lawyer, skull and bones, then you can afford to set aside morality, principle, sympathy, empathy, righteousness, the fear of God, the hatred of evil, conscience, reason, logic, and common sense, having abandoned all that, setting a fine example, might making right, then there is cash, not just Federal Reserve Notes either, that stuff is for the victims, you, my dear fellow grasshopper, can get the Gold too.
What is on the to do list at that point?
Troll every community looking for desperate people and then dangle a counterfeit solution to their problems, and all they have to do to cash in, is to play by the rules?
The current rules, of course, not yesterdays rules, not the rules ruled in the last few seconds, no, no, no, the rules that rule are handed down from above.
No, not that far above, of course not, there are people in offices, and they have magic check books.
They can buy anyone, and therefore they can buy almost anything.
So, again, it seems to me, Trial by Jury is integral, but the target is The FED, and the solution is the same thing, and the target is The IRS, and the solution is the same thing, and the target is the criminals ordering The Troops to commit Legal Crimes, and very bad ones at that, and the solution is the same thing again.
The FED goes down when we compete, inventing, producing, and maintaining competitive money, which can be worse money, more deceptive money, if we are better criminals, or it can be what?
Money that is high in the POWER it contains?
Power to Purchase?
Purchase anything, including a lot of people who are deceived?
Accurate Productive POWER is better money.
It is better because it has launderability?
It is better because it is actually POWERFUL, such as electricity, which is either/or productive or destructive according to a very narrow measure of reality - having no power to launder it, no power to falsify it, and no power to deceive anyone.
What is a watt?
It is POWER.
Anyway, diverging too far, and returning to the point:
RE: Liberty “It is POWER, and it works in numbers, in opposition to nature, where we must cooperate and dominate nature, going forth and multiplying, and we, our numbers, have at least one other chore that can't be avoided, because our opposition targets us, and intends to exploit us, so we are forced to deal with them.”
The Numbers Game of Liberty = Ectropy?
Yes, and the word has been sent into the corn field, on down into the Memory Hole, and it can't even be spell checked without internal authority, and some searching by way of researching or some competitive method of finding the accurate spelling of the word Ectropy.
The meaning intended is what?
Use the scarce supply of productive power in such an effective way as to increase the scarce supply of productive power into a condition of greater abundance?
The opposite of consuming power in the work of destroying things, and destroying the things that produce more power, and therefore the power that is required to sustain life grows exponentially less abundant, reaching a point of scarcity whereby the fewer and fewer life forms dying from starvation will cut each others throats for their exclusive miniscule section of the exponentially smaller amount of power as power reduces to nothing?
Why did Stalin order all that wheat destroyed?
Why did the specialists running The Brain Trust during the Great Depression order all those Cattle to be killed and buried?
That was how World Wars are purchased. Pay evil people a lot of money to do what they do best, and like Magic, like the magic check book, who could imagine what could happen, when we provide everything we hold dear to be the means by which we suffer?
We provide (everything) the means by which we suffer.
What can we expect to get for that investment?
Freedom from Life?
The opposite of happiness, unless torture and mass murder make us really happy?
"Ectropy is difficult because it works against the natural grain of entropy?"
Here is the God concept again, mere human beings trying to image the impossible, whereby some POWER somehow causes so much creation where, obviously, there was so little creation before that POWER somehow causes so much creation.
Call it whatever you want, read the righteous words in The Good Book, and call that creation POWER the words in that book, sure, but failing to "believe" that the POWER exists?
How much POWER does it take, put a measure on it, a wild guess, as to the full measure of the POWER required to create more than a grain of sand, more than a few planets, more than a dozen solar systems, more than a million galaxies, and a mere human being is going to claim authority over another human being?
Sure, sure, I get it, a child of mine aught to be forced by me to stop running into busy streets, but do I have to tell them not to look at the sun?
Who is telling them to provide the means by which we suffer?
I don't teach stupid to my kids, they, and I, can manage all the stupid anyone else can manage all on their own, they, and I, don't need help being stupider.
So who is claiming that Man has authority over other Men, to save the children, no less?
“Ron Paul is a specialist, and he set the bar very high, as to what can be done in that special field, a Statesman, not a Juror, and there may be much to learn by his example, such as the decision to focus on a very narrow beam of POWER aiming at a few very troubling concerns. Omission can be a willful crime, or it can be a balance of power issue, along the lines of triage?”
Yes, I understand the narrow beam of Power. But if that narrow beam of Power were directed at reinstating True Trial by Jury, would not that single thing, Trial by Jury, cause the Fed to end, cease the IRS, and bring the troops home…all thru the court of law? When the laws are made by the people would not the people set the course toward Liberty?
Yes, of course, once good people stop being stupid, Trials will happen each morning, as each Juror wakes up with an even better outlook, once Deceit from "above" is put in the right place, by each newly woke up Friend of Liberty, and they will get out of bed, and they will go to act upon these new Trials, these new Judgements, and they will pass judgement, in or out of an official court, and we win.
The Ron Paul example highlights specific goals to wake up the Jurors who are not Judging, and once they awake, one individual at a time, they can decide which, in their own special way, is more important first, use better money, or get on a Jury.
Which can be done first?
Can I stop paying Federal Income Tax first, or should I set a few people free first, so how do I do that, exactly, today?
In real time?
I have a JUROR notice hanging on my computer tower right next to the keyboard.
Can someone go down to the court and volunteer to be a Juror?
How many people does it take doing how many special things individually, whereby the total sum of individual acts result in the end of the IRS?
Ron Paul hasn't thought this out?
I have not thought this out?
You are just now thinking this out?
How does one seed become a garden?
"What will happen if we End the Fed, End the IRS, and Bring the Troops home, but do not have True Trial by Jury?"
I think the answer is no such thing can happen, but which Trial by Jury do YOU have in mind?
Actual Trial by Jury or Counterfeit Trial by Jury?
What POWER moves closer toward the counterfeit version?
What POWER moves closer toward the opposite goal?
"Is Liberty based on competitive money alone or must we have competitive law as well?"
You see, but you may not see fully yet, and the POWER is a FORCE and the FORCE is a total sum of decisions made by many individuals who choose better from worse, and that FORCE has been called "The Free Market" or "The Invisible hand" or any False Front used by anyone, to hold a THING for accountability for that which individual people do on their own volition IN Liberty.
The FORCE can be called competition, but it is not the word COMPETITION, as if COMPETITION were a thing, an entity, a God, a being, a responsible thing, no, no, no, Competition is the one person choosing better over worse, and another person choosing better over worse, and many more people choosing better over worse, and the total sum of all those decisions FORCE anyone to pay attention to that FORCE, and worse is left behind and better is invented, produced, and maintained, because that is what a lot of people want, not the opposite.
What is the opposite?
Provide more of the means by which we suffer, to save the children, because only the lesser of two evils can, if they have enough fraud money?
You know now, I trust, that there can never be enough fraud money, one lie requires two to cover up the first, then four to cover up those two, and then sixteen, that is how that works - very interesting.
What will stupid people not believe, and some people take you to task for believing in Jesus?
If we have competitive law first, will we not have competitive money also?
If we have competitive money alone, will that guarantee competitive law?
I know, in a relative sense, that I am very stupid, almost as stupid as the stupidest living being alive today, and the difference between how smart I am, on a scale from stupidest to smartest, is irrelevant when compared to the fact that either we, as a species, sink, or swim, in my life time, and I may be able to help swim, not sink.
Competition is in a power struggle against Monopoly, and if Monopoly wins, then everyone will be cutting each others throats until there are two people left, and one will eat the other.