before or after the interview, I completely agree with what he said from 0:20 to 1:25 of the second video.
Back in the 2008 election, I remember Dr. Paul being cornered by a woman from "We are change". She asked him why he hadn't come out about the "truth" on 9/11. This, at a time when the media was doing its best to tarnish Dr. Paul. That ROYALLY ticked me off. So she possibly gets the quote she wants, pats herself on the back, and does irreparable damage to the movement.
I have enyoyed some of their interviews in the past, such as the Doug Wead interview, but they need to tone it down with liberty candidates. The interviewer may have wanted to ask Hunter innocent questions at the end, but Jack had no way of knowing about that from past encounters the figures in the movement have had with "We are change".
Btw, I think the interviewer conducted himself well, they just need to start asking different questions. What do we think would happen if all of our liberty figures came out on record completely agreeing with everything "We are change" would like them to admit to on tape? The media would have a field day and the movement would cut itself off at the knees.
Sorry, I had to vent a bit. I actually like this particular interviewer compared to others.