Comment: which I've accepted, as examplified by the different link that I

(See in situ)

which I've accepted, as examplified by the different link that I

replied you with, which I looked up on my own to verify, as curiosity prompted me to, after reading an earlier reply below, before I ever saw your post.

again, big whup.

You DO know that I meant the "judging"-commentary sarcastically, right?

I don't care whether you're "judging" or not; that's irrelevant. We're stretching a, point, here. LOL

Neither of us are gonna win a $8500-ish Barrett M107A1 for pointing out what was admittedly posted in 2005, as I clearly replied with "I just found out."

But, seeing as how you really want to be an accuracy hound, I'll bite for the last time: I've never said "it's just 'begun?'" That's solely your characterization, but it's obvious you interpreted it as such.

What I did say was "It's begun!"

"It's begun" signifies merely a commencement of something, without a specific reference to a temporal range, though it can certainly be interpreted to mean within a contemporary temporal range. Then again, how something is interpreted within someone else's mind, no one has a control over.

"It's just begun" signifies a commencement of something with implied relatively accepted timeframe, within the confines of a given discussion at hand.

Nevertheless, "just" is not bound by a specifically measurable time metric; depending on the context and the range of temporal spectrum invoked, "just" can be 5seconds ago, to 5minutes ago, to 50mins. ago, to 5 days ago, to 50yrs ago.

Is that "accurate" enough for you?


I kid, 'cause I love. This will be my last reply on the matter. Thanks.

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul