Comment: "to"

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: If he misspelled it (see in situ)

"to"

I believe the writer probably would've meant "to", but had written "too", which means 'also' and makes no sense in the sentence.

If I have to guess what he means in a simple sentence, there is no credibility to what follows.

How could one read this type of subject if one needs to 'guess' what is meant?