Comment: Reply Part I

(See in situ)


Reply Part I

>>>>I have declared myself a god. Do you see the difference?<<<

>>You posted “I believe I am God”<<

If you are going to quote me, please use everything I said:

"I believe that I am God and believe that everyone else is too.."

"Can YOU create a god? Can you even create a human being? Yet God created you. CLEARLY you are not equals."

Yes I can, her name is Sofia, other gods created me, CLEARLY and we are all equals.

"Perhaps you would be more easily understood if you provided a definition/powers of the god that you believe you are. God is the legitimate authority."

God is an Idea created by Man, no Man stands between other Men and God. God is our son and our father. Every Man Is Sovereign.

>>>>"and presumably therefore create your own truth and morality you must then admit that everyone else has the same right/ability."

"No. That is moral relativism. Truth does not depend on perspective, what “is” is, or the current fashion. 2+2=4."

Why did you propose the possibility of one creating their own truth ("create your own truth")when you know that "what “is” is, or the current fashion. 2+2=4"? There are many truths that are not true.

"Right is right, wrong is wrong. Lying is wrong, stealing is wrong, murder is wrong. Brainwashing children is wrong…even when done for the “greater good”. In your POV there is no right or wrong, truth or lie."

I would like you to think about a situation where lying may be right.
I will give you a hand if you find it hard.

I create my own definition of right and wrong and do not impose it on others. There is truth and there are lies.

"Since you define your own morality, others must be free to do the same. Supose they do not accept the NAP and believe as a smarter god than you they have the right to enslave you. Would they not be just as correct as you?"

Of course others are free to do the same. They can try and I can't stop them from trying. Enslave me? Only if I let them do that.

"Would they not be just as correct as you?" What does this mean?

>>>>>"Anything goes and can be deemed righteous by anyone."
It can be deemed righteous by anyone, but it does not mean that it is.<<<<

"By what authority could you claim it is not?"

By the sovereign authority I hold as a god among gods.

>>>> By claiming to be a god, I am claiming the authority to act and speak for myself and deem righteous what I hold as the truth under my perspective while not submitting myself to the authority of any other gods.<<<<

"You claimed you are God. You claim the right to define your own truth while obviously inadequate to do so (no insult intended, all humans are inadequate in this regard) and do not recognize legitimate authority, only your own. You have to allow others the same right as you have asserted, only don’t be surprised when you don’t like THEIR “truths” and moralities."

"You claimed you are God." That is not true.

"You claim the right to define your own truth while obviously inadequate to do so (no insult intended, all humans are inadequate in this regard) and do not recognize legitimate authority, only your own."

That is insulting but I pardon you and hope you can pardon yourself for using those words.

"You have to allow others the same right as you have asserted, only don’t be surprised when you don’t like THEIR “truths” and moralities."

Exactly, others do have the same right. I will not be surprised if I "don’t like THEIR “truths” and moralities" (or maybe I will LOL as there are some "crazy" folks out there that don't know they are gods yet), but as long as their " “truths” and moralities " do not trample on mine, there is a good chance we can all live in peace.
Since that is not the case yet, I come to the Dailypaul.com to hangout with others who either already know they are gods or are very close to discovering that reality.

(to be continued..)

www.youtube.com/truefictions

I try to change people every day. Do You?