Comment: Please stop making assumptions about what I do or do not think.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Fireant...I already told you (see in situ)

fireant's picture

Please stop making assumptions about what I do or do not think.

I've considered all the standing bevel cut beams and they are not conclusive, not for grand jury standards. There are no slide marks or pocking, which does not help the case for them being part of controlled demolition. The only way to resolve it is to talk to the personnel on site. It's on the table, as is the assumed molten steel, which in itself is not conclusive. Try to understand we must measure up to grand jury standards if we are ever to make sense of all this and get justice.
I'm not screaming for "evidence". I'm screaming for conclusive structural evidence of cut members in the debris pile which would prove controlled demolition. I can only find sheared members. That is not consistent with other evidence, and is a fatal flaw for controlled demolition.
We do not find truth by reaching conclusions based on incomplete or disingenuous evidence.

Undo what Wilson did