Why such a virulent attack for wanting to make sure Oathkeepers is legit?
Aren't we allow to question the "official story" here?
Sorry but the attacks for just questioning are chillingly reminiscent of other sites where the status quo is not to be questioned.
I find it interesting how quickly Stewart Rhodes was made available
Some folks have raised legitimate concerns re Oathkeepers on other boards. THey can express that.
Truth doesn't fear scrutiny. Fierce opposition to scrutiny is a sign of deceit.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: