Comment: in reading both posts

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: +1, but not out of support (see in situ)

in reading both posts

it strikes me that gerhardt is a loon that has a problem with reality. the tone seems narcisistic, his version of the facts don't seem logical, and he comes off as a "go-along-to-get-along" powermonger instead of someone truely interested in restoring the principle of our constitution.

leadership involves motivating people for a common cause. his cause seems to be him.

Q seems much more in touch with reality. her motives seem more in line with that of an honest person.

i've been wrong before, and i'll be wrong again, but that is the impression i get.