I never assumed the government had the right to demand anything.
I never created a false dilemma. The dilemma was the conflict of two internal principles... honesty regardless of the situation versus defending the defenseless.
You're intentionally misconstruing what was said in order to feel like you made a valid counter-argument when in reality you're countering an argument that was never made.
I assume the vast majority of the human race is stupid before I come in contact with them... so why should I be angry of what I've already accepted?
I think the correct and more accurate observation would be "dissapointed". Maybe more so than usual with the human race, because I had thought I could hold the liberty movement to a higher standard.
Boy, was I wrong.
Critical Thinking > Emotional Thinking > Pseudo-Intellectuals that Saturate DP
Utilitarianism > Consequentialism > Deontology > Egocentrism
Making people feel "troll'd" with the truth > being an intentional troll > acting like one naturally
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: