Comment: Well let's add 1 + 1 then. One 1 is missing. How will we get 2?

(See in situ)


fireant's picture

Well let's add 1 + 1 then. One 1 is missing. How will we get 2?

Again you offer false comparisons. Show me where I have implied that because there is no structural evidence of demolition, it is then fact demolition was not used. There are more categories for evidence than just two you know. Several things are still on the table unanswered. So, look at the rest of the evidence and see what it says.
But I can say this as fact: There is no evidence in the debris fields the buildings were cut apart in order to collapse them. The overwhelming evidence is that they came apart at their connections.
Let's keep it simple. Are you saying that statement is false?

Undo what Wilson did