Comment: My point is this thread states emphatically the buildings were

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: How do you explain it (see in situ)

fireant's picture

My point is this thread states emphatically the buildings were

demoed, AND states it is IMPOSSIBLE for there to have been any other explanation.
Those are dangerous and reckless claims, the type claims used by con artists. Those claims cannot be proven. They are lies.
It is not up to me to explain anything, but up to the poster to prove it. He can't.

Undo what Wilson did