The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.


Comment: Monsanto's genetic material trespasses.
Monsanto's genetic material trespasses.
Any farmer found with infected (raped) plant material is sued for theft and patent infringement.
I would be against gmo patents at the very least. Patents that became necessary because of the USDA interventions.
A farmer should be able to sue the trespasser, the same as if a gmo bull had impregnated the farmers livestock.
Plus there have been no clinical studies to show gmos are safe for human or animal consumption. Or multi-generational studies to prove reproduction is viable.
No one has lived to 100 years eating GMO foods, for example.
Is it fear, or the products lack of qualifications as gras.
I have no reason to believe that I am not playing Russian Roulette with GMO.
Free includes debt-free!
Replies to this comment: