Comment: both of those points are entirely irrelevant to the question

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Good post. (see in situ)

both of those points are entirely irrelevant to the question

of WHY whomever killed him did so.

The thread is about WHY.

You two are ignoring what you can't prove or back up with any facts and are trying to divert the discussion.

The issue is "did he try to end the FED? did he try to increase silver circulation? did he try to increase US Note circulation? did he try to decrease FRN circulation?"

The ONLY shred of anything CLAIMED to point to a "yes" for all of those is the EO 111110. But have you READ that EO?

Do you know what it says?

Try reading it. Then get back to us.