"The strawman you are creating is that I said that I like Krauthammer and agree with him."
If your claim was only that people believe that Krauthammer has great "intellectual prowess," then I have nothing to say, I suppose that's true since he's a successful pundit. However, I took it you were agreeing that he's a fine intellect, and was countering that claim. Yes, I'm aware that you did not explicitly say that, that was only the implication I drew from what you said, not unreasonably I think.
"The strawman you are creating is that I said that I like Krauthammer and agree with him. I was only countering the assertion that nobody cared what he said. Krauthammer is a neocon therefore I despise his analysis nearly all of the time.
Please give due diligence to actually understanding the content of a comment before rapid-fire emotional responses. Daily Paul isn't a first-person shooter game. You can take your time digesting comments before replying. There's no hurry... :p"
The only emotion on display here is yours. I have no horse in the race.
"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: