Comment: A conservative pointed out on

(See in situ)

A conservative pointed out on

A conservative pointed out on the same day I posted this thread, exactly what I assert in the thread.
On July 21, 2012 at 2:24:

The media is painting James Holmes as crazy, because they want to cover the fact that he was a product of brainwashing by leftist professors. Liberal professors are pumping these kids up to be Revolutionaries, but the Establishment will blame guns instead so they can be banned.

Unfortunately they do not know that a California municipality has refused to provide effective mental health care when state laws define that it must be developed IF there is a chance of loss of life without it.

Unfortunately, again, gun owners are so easily misled that they are not acknowledging that IF there is no effective mental health care THEN, the possibility of mass murders increases.

When courts refuse to compel municipalities to follow state laws that require them to act to develop treaments AND the infiltration of social activism for gun rights invokes unreasonable fears such as this thread has elicited from users here; about screening and limiting gun ownership, while the Aurora shooting drops out of the media lens, THEN gun rights activists are sucked back into the (nwo) preferred attitudes that are easily controlled and misinterpreted for discussion.

Realize the analysis of the link at top is perhaps the only one while the media eye has abandoned the story meaning another mass murder has gone under the bridge without any real understanding.

Gun owners, you are being misled by the ignorant or the deceptive.

Can we stop doing all the things we are doing that we do not want to do while still doing what we need to do?